Hindsight
ResultsPricingGet a Demo

Deal Review Agent

Every closed deal investigated. Automatically.

Most deal reviews never happen. The Deal Review Agent runs on every closed deal, the moment it closes. It pulls every signal, resolves contradictions, and tells you what actually happened.

Deal Review Agent
LIVE

How It's Different

Not a summary.
An investigation.

There is a difference between an AI that reads your CRM and one that questions it.

SalesforceLoss reason: Pricing
Agent searches transcripts and emails. Finds no pricing mentions.CONTRADICTS
Looks for other loss drivers. Finds 3 references to a missing integration.CORROBORATES
Confidence: Low. Kicking off buyer interview.INTERVIEW ↗

What It Investigates

On every deal. Every time. Without being asked.

Deal Review·Meridian Health
Closed Lost$240K ARR

Exec Summary

Meridian Health selected Frontline by Ormandy over Hindsight despite an active evaluation. The $240K ARR deal was lost primarily due to a perceived integration gap with their existing QuickBooks Online setup and concerns about migration risk. The rep marked loss reason as 'pricing' in Salesforce — buyer interviews revealed integration confidence was the real driver.

Decision Drivers

Integration Confidence 38%

Buyer cited the absence of a native QuickBooks connector as the deciding factor. Three separate calls referenced it unprompted.

Migration Risk 24%

Champion flagged the complexity of migrating existing job history. No migration playbook was presented during evaluation.

Incumbent Relationship 20%

Ormandy had a two-year relationship with the IT lead. Switching cost was perceived as high even before the demo.

Pricing 10%

Mentioned once in email. CRM recorded this as the primary loss reason — interviews do not support that conclusion.

Other 8%

Timeline pressure and procurement cycle length contributed marginally.

Scorecard

Product Fit
3/5
Sales Execution
2/5
Relationship Strength
2/5
Pricing Fit
4/5
Competitive Perf.
2/5
Messaging Fit
3/5

Competitors

Frontline by Ormandy

Winner

Selected. Had incumbent advantage and a native QuickBooks integration. Positioning focused on low-friction migration.

Manual processes

Evaluated

Status quo was considered briefly. Dismissed early — not a real competitive threat in this deal.

Features

QuickBooks Integration

Gap3

Buyer required a native connector. Hindsight does not have one — this was the deal's turning point.

Service Workflow Automation

Love2

Buyer was impressed by the automation demo. Not enough to overcome the integration concern.

Job & Project Management

Request2

Buyer asked whether job-level deal tracking was on the roadmap. Rep did not have an answer.

Answers

Decision Maker

Persona

IT Decision Maker

Primary Needs

Native integrations with existing finance and operations stack. Low-friction onboarding with minimal disruption to active service workflows. Confidence in vendor support during migration.

Decision Drivers

What actually moved the buyer's decision. Each driver labeled, explained, and scored. No more one-word loss reasons.

Influence scoreConfidence scoreEvidence chain

Competitors

Every competitor that touched the deal and how you did. Tagged by type: incumbent, primary, secondary. Tagged by outcome: selected, evaluated, mentioned.

Type taggingOutcome taggingConfidence score

Features

Features that impacted the decision. Labeled by type: gap, request, love, confusion, competitive comparison. Great for product roadmapping.

Gap / Request / LoveSentiment scoredCitations

Deal Metrics

Multi-demnsional scorecard across product fit, competitive position, pricing fit, sales execution, relationship, and more. Tied to your rubrics.

6 dimensionsScore explanationsCited sources

Exec Summary

One clean narrative that ties it all together. The full deal story in plain language — what happened, why, and what would have changed the outcome.

Plain languageFull narrativeActionable conclusions

Custom Answers

Any prompt you want to run, any output schema. Ask it to score a deal against your own rubric, extract a specific fact, or fill a field your team cares about. Maps directly to CRM fields on close.

Any promptAny schemaCRM field mapping

Reasoning Chain

Every conclusion is verifiable.

See exactly what was checked, what was found, and how confident the agent is. Low confidence triggers the Win-Loss Interview Agent automatically.

Reasoning Thread · Deal #2847⚠ Contradiction
Checking loss reasonChecking

CRM field: “Loss reason: Pricing”

Cross-referencing sourcesContradicts

3 calls reviewed. Pricing: 1 mention. Email negotiation: none.

Searching for true driverCorroborates

QuickBooks integration gap: 6× across 3 calls.

Resolved & VerifiedInterview ↗

Pricing: LOW · Integration gap: HIGH · Buyer interview triggered

Confidence
92%

The Output

The output every team can use.

For your CRM

Verified data written back to your CRM for critical win-loss, competitive, and product data.

For your dashboards

Structured fields mapped to your labels. Feeds tabular data and metrics automatically.

For your AI tools

A verified markdown deal record. Clean inputs for every workflow built on top.

Customization

Built for your workflow. Not ours.

Sales ExecutionMetric
1

Lowest

Missed key opportunities, poor communication

3

Average

Met basic expectations, standard process

5

Highest

Exceptional process, perfect timing

Custom fields

Fill CRM dispositions, tag personas, score deals against your own rubrics. Any field, any schema.

FeatureLabelArea
QuickBooks IntegrationGapIntegrations
Service Workflow Auto.LoveCore Product
Job & Project MgmtRequestCore Product
Data MigrationGapOnboarding

Your labels

Map competitors, drivers, and features to your own taxonomy. The agent learns your language.

Get Started

Every deal reviewed. Every contradiction resolved.